Conformance of products & processes (IATF only)
Plain-language summary
You are accountable for the conformity of everything you supply — including outsourced processes and service/spare parts — to every customer, statutory and regulatory requirement.
What the clause is really asking
Subcontracting the work never subcontracts the responsibility. If your plater, heat-treater or software house gets it wrong, the nonconformity is yours. The clause pins that accountability explicitly, including for service parts that often escape mainstream controls.
What auditors look for
Auditors probe the edges: how outsourced operations are specified, controlled and verified (links to 8.4); whether service parts follow the same controls as production parts; how statutory/regulatory conformity (materials, substances, markings) is assured for everything shipped.
Typical evidence
Outsourced process controls and monitoring records; service part control plans; regulatory compliance evidence (e.g., material certs, IMDS submissions).
How to comply — recommendations
Treat outsourced processes as extensions of your own line: specify requirements in writing, verify on receipt, monitor performance, audit periodically. Give service parts an explicit home in your control plans rather than assuming production rules cover them.
Common nonconformities
Heat-treater quality treated as 'their problem' with no incoming verification; service parts produced without current control plan; regulatory declarations missing for shipped product.
Related clauses
Builds on ISO 9001 4.4 / 8.4
Qlause provides interpretive guidance only and is not a substitute for the standard. Refer to your licensed copy of ISO 9001 / IATF 16949 for the authoritative text.